قابل توجه تمامی مشتریان محترم، وبسایت جورنادا دارای نماد اعتماد الکترونیک میباشد.
ارسال سفارش بر عهده مشتری
Nowhere is a studiously discreet label measured as loudly as on the secondary market. Bags from The Row are built with no exterior logos, no monogram canvas and no campaign explaining what they cost; the secondary market prices them in public all the same, week after week. What that market has been saying since 2025 is quietly remarkable: a brand with next to no logo recognition now occupies a place near the top of the value-retention tables. This piece sets out which models drive that result, which ones do not, and how to read the numbers without turning them into a promise. Everything below sets out observed market behaviour, using figures the platforms have reported themselves. It is not investment advice, and it is not a forecast.
One further piece of framing before the data. The Row keeps no published master price list, which means every dollar figure below is an observed 2026 market price or a reported resale range rather than an official quote. Prices at retail move, prices on resale move faster, and the gap between them can widen sharply within one season. A bag trading above retail one quarter can trade below it the next. Resale prices can fall, and they do. Take the percentages as a snapshot of a market in motion rather than a permanent attribute of the bag.
Rebag’s CLAIR report for 2025 is the source of the most quoted figure of all: brand-level value retention for The Row at 97%. That figure moved the label into what the report calls the unicorn tier, which covers brands holding 85% or more of retail on the secondary market. This was the brand’s first crossing of that line, leaving The Row behind only Telfar, Hermes and Goyard in the ranking. For a house whose bags carry no visible branding at all, that is a counterintuitive result. Second-hand buyers, it suggests, are paying for construction, silhouette and scarcity rather than for a recognisable badge. There the row bag bags is a practical reality behind it as well: production is modest and distribution short, which keeps used stock scarce relative to demand.
A brand average hides as much as it reveals; the model-level numbers in the same report are the ones worth reading. Strongest of the group was the N/S Park Tote at 146% retention, meaning typical resale prices sat above original retail rather than below it. Behind it came the Margaux Tote at 107%, with the Half Moon shoulder bag at 106%. Those three silhouettes carry the brand’s reputation, and they are also the ones most often searched for by name. Look at how tight the gap is between the second and third entries and how far ahead the tote sits. That gap is the whole story: a soft, unstructured the row tote bag priced mid-range at retail is now the label’s most reliable resale performer, ahead of bags costing two or three times as much new.
| Bag | Value retention reported for 2025 | How to read the number |
|---|---|---|
| N/S Park Tote | 146% | The strongest single performer, where a low retail entry point meets very broad demand |
| Margaux Tote | 107% | The flagship, where thin new supply supports the price |
| Half Moon shoulder | 106% | Entry-priced new, so there is room above that figure on resale |
| The Row, brand level | 97% | First time above the 85%-plus unicorn tier line |
Some context helps, as 97% sounds like a maximum until you see the actual ceiling. In the same report the Hermes Kelly Mini II posted 282% retention and the Birkin Sellier 183%, with the Constance at 137%. Goyard landed at 123% and Miu Miu at 104%. That places The Row well short of the top of the market, but unusually high for a brand of its age and scale, and still climbing rather than settling. The Hermes figures rest on decades of waiting lists and controlled allocation, a mechanism this label does not operate. The useful lesson from the comparison is that scarcity generates similar price behaviour whether it is engineered by a century-old house or emerges naturally from a small, tightly distributed line.
What follows is exactly the part that gets lost when headline percentages travel alone. Appreciation is not a brand-wide property, and the pattern in what does appreciate is consistent enough to set out plainly. Black and neutral calfskin versions of the signature silhouettes carry the strength, being the bags a buyer would still want three seasons from now in precisely the colour they bought. The model name explains less here than material and colour do. The pieces that discount are those with narrower appeal, and canvas, nylon, sisal and seasonal colours all trade below retail with some regularity. A bright seasonal calfskin or a summer raffia can sit unsold at a price the same silhouette in black would clear within days.
Beyond the CLAIR data there is a second layer of numbers circulating in coverage of The Row bags, and it deserves more caution. The Margaux has been reported to sell frequently at around 40% above retail, and one authenticator said its Margaux resale volume rose roughly 44% year over year. Another marketplace reported pre-owned Margaux sales averaging about 15% above original retail. Reports in early 2026 put the Margaux 15 changing hands somewhere in the region of $4,350 to $6,000 and above, as an observed market price rather than any official one. The 90’s Bag, meanwhile, has been flagged as the riser, with reported search volume on one large marketplace up around 55% year over year as of April 2025. These are directional signals from individual platforms, not audited market-wide statistics, and a single soft quarter can flatten any of them.
Some of the Margaux’s behaviour is a supply question. The bag was reported across 2025 to have left third-party retailers, a change that was never officially confirmed by the brand, while the official line-up now carries the Soft Margaux and the Margaux Shoulder rather than the original. It has never been announced as discontinued. In resale terms the relevant point is that fewer new units come to the open market through stockists, so second-hand supply tightens for a bag already in demand. That describes supply; it does not prove a permanent premium. Should distribution widen again, the gap between retail and resale narrows with it.
For anyone shopping rather than tracking indices, these figures should change what gets compared. The Row bag bought at retail in a core colour tends to hold its ground, which makes the real cost of ownership lower than the sticker suggests. A bag bought on resale at a premium has already had that upside priced in, so you are paying for immediacy rather than for value. The useful question every time is whether a listing is priced against the current market or against a headline from a year ago. Condition, colour and completeness move a listing’s price far more than any model average does. Searching for The Row for sale on any given afternoon will surface disciplined pricing and wishful pricing side by side.
None of it is investment advice, and retention percentages must never be read as a return. A handbag is a consumer good that scuffs, stretches, stains and falls out of favour, and its resale value depends on the mood of a market nobody controls. Prices on resale can fall, occasionally in a hurry, and a percentage published for 2025 records what already happened, not what comes next. Any spread between what you paid and what the next buyer will pay is shrunk by fees and authentication costs. Wear a bag regularly and it loses condition, and condition is the single largest discount factor on every platform that trades these bags. Summarised honestly, The Row handbags have held their value unusually well of late, which is a pleasant fact about a purchase rather than a reason to make one.